Lecture 1
  Polanyi’s Great Transformation
Polanyi’s Obejctives
- Explain rise of fascism, political instability and war
 
- Advance an argument about negative effects of economic liberalism
 
- Provide an alternative vision of the economy’s place in society
 
- Defend market regulation as not inherently “leftist”
 
The Self-Regulating Market
The “Invisible Hand”
- 19th century economic liberalism
 
- An economy directed by market prices and nothing but market prices
 
- Polanyi calls it a “dangerous fantasy”
 
- Tremendous amount of bureaucracy/governance required to maintain free markets
 
State of Nature I
- For Smith, our nature is to “truck, barter and trade”
 
- For Polanyi, we are communal by nature
 
- Markets have always played some role in society but not the dominant role
 
- Importance of ethnography
- Evidence-based approach
 
- Not just a rhetorical device
 
 
State of Nature II
- Trobriand Islanders (Papua New Guinea)
 
- People motivated by status more than money
- Money is a means to and end
 
 
- Money not that relevant for distribution
- Reciprocity
 
- Redistribution
 
- Householding
 
 
Discussion
- What is your view of the state of nature?
 
- Is it more similar to Karl Polanyi’s or Adam Smith’s?
 
Discussion
- Polanyi argues that economic liberalism generates political instability
 
- Looking at the graph, do you see the connection?
 
- Can you also find evidence challenging Polanyi’s view?
 
Small Groups
- Review the concept of the double movement as it is presented in Chapter 11 of The Great Transformation
 
- What does Polanyi mean by a “movement” and a “counter-movement”?
 
- Who are the actors involved?
- Who is affected by this “movement”
 
- What does the “counter-movement” entail?
 
 
- Try using ChatGPT to help interpret the text
 
Description of Double Movement
- Movement: expansion of liberalism and self-regulating markets
 
- Counter-movement: reaction of society against dislocation caused by markets
 
- New regulations
- Purpose is to shelter land, labor and the money supply against “devastating effects” of policies used to sustain self-regulating markets
 
- Importance of class dynamics: winners and losers
 
 
Who are the Opponents of Liberalism?
- Not a unified, hegemonic left or an anti-liberal ideology
 
- Responses are rather piecemeal
- Regulation arises in many areas
 
- Across many countries
 
- In response to similar problems
 
 
- Regulation is a result of liberalism’s failure, not its cause
 
Small Groups
- Can Polanyi’s theory of the “double movement” be applied to contemporary politics?
 
- Provide at least two concrete examples to support your view
- Be sure to identify
- The “movement”
 
- The “countermovement”
 
- The actors involved, e.g. winners and losers
 
 
 
Elements of Liberalism
- Unfettered labor market
 
- Gold standard
- Facilitated trade
 
- Kept prices in check
 
 
- Free trade
- Industrialists/traders wanted to access raw materials
 
- Facilitated by the gold standard
 
 
The Gold Standard (1879-1973)
- Pegging the value of the dollar to gold
 
- Problems
- Deflationary: could not print money in excess of gold supply
 
- Led to dramatic boom-bust cycles
 
 
- Reforms
- 1931: Roosevelt ends gold standard domestically
 
- 1971: Nixon ends Bretton Woods
 
 
Small Groups
- Review Chapter 12
 
- What are some misconceptions about the origins of liberalism?
 
- When and why did liberalism actually emerge?
 
- How does the “double movement” apply to the birth of liberalism?
 
- What are some elements of the “counter-movement”?
 
- Utilize ChatGPT to help interpret the text
 
Where Did Liberalism Come From?
- Does not date back to Smith or Ricardo
 
- These thinkers were ahead of their time
 
- Emerged out of class politics following industrial revolution